Please Tim, I hope you are getting this stance on film. |
This is how you lick it and stick it. |
And in keeping with the theme of shamelessness, I was reminded the other day by a friend of the celebrity benefit concert that will be coming to the TD Garden to benefit the One Fund to help the victims of the bombing. My friend is a New Yorker, and was chiding me gently about the pedigree of the lineup. For both the 9/11 Concerts and Sandy Relief, New York got some epic names and epic performances. Boston gets Aerosmith and Dane Cook. (I can understand the Aerosmith demographic. Aging boomers tend to have a lot of money. But what is Dane Cook's appeal? Is the festering pus-filled douchebag demographic a well monied one? I need a Pew poll.) While I'm sure the show will be a good time for those in attendance and will raise money, I always question large scale celebrity events in the name of charity. I'm jaded by the aftermath of 9/11 when the United Way and Red Cross both were accused of mishandling funds donated in the spirit of wanting to help the victims.
While I think the Robin Hood fund and One Fund have learned from the mistakes of the post 9/11 charitable assistance drives, there is still much to be leery about. (And not Denis Leary, despite his avowed asshole-ish ness. His work for firefighters is legendary.) Recently the Boston Globe ran a feature about how celebrity charities and events tend to be more about self-aggrandizement and tax avoision, rather than actually helping out the charity. We see an event, we raise money, but there is little to no follow through on whether the event helped the people it intended to help. I also question the efficiency of buying something for charity. Unless the goods or service is donated, there are some overhead costs that take away from the monies donated. I've always felt my money is better used given directly to a cause rather than through a raffle or other such fund raising mechanism. The fewer hands in the til, the better the odds the money goes to the right people. (Donations to the Ghost Man on Third Bourbon and Bacon Fund are not tax deductible).
Do I catch the ball or the girl? So confused. |
While I think the Robin Hood fund and One Fund have learned from the mistakes of the post 9/11 charitable assistance drives, there is still much to be leery about. (And not Denis Leary, despite his avowed asshole-ish ness. His work for firefighters is legendary.) Recently the Boston Globe ran a feature about how celebrity charities and events tend to be more about self-aggrandizement and tax avoision, rather than actually helping out the charity. We see an event, we raise money, but there is little to no follow through on whether the event helped the people it intended to help. I also question the efficiency of buying something for charity. Unless the goods or service is donated, there are some overhead costs that take away from the monies donated. I've always felt my money is better used given directly to a cause rather than through a raffle or other such fund raising mechanism. The fewer hands in the til, the better the odds the money goes to the right people. (Donations to the Ghost Man on Third Bourbon and Bacon Fund are not tax deductible).
Levitate me |
Not that it really matters, since musical taste is subjective (unless of course you like Nickleback. Then there is no hope for your soul.) and the concert is more a way to avoid taxes raise money than celebrate the music of Boston (the city, not the band.) I just wanted an excuse to mention the Pixies and segue into...
Video or Song of the Week that Interests Me (And Probably Only Me)
One of my favorite movies and uses of a song not written specifically for a movie in a movie. (Think the piano coda from "Layla" when all the bodies are discovered after the Luftansa heist in "Goodfellas")
A full live version of the song here. FOR MORE ABOUT THE PIXIES CONSULT YOUR LOCAL LIBRARY.
Games You People Played In
We got a run mutherfuckers! But since I bet the under, we can't go out for pancakes. |
The Newton Benchmarks scored their first run.!!!!!!! With a hit from Superstar Brett, Jesse was able to bring it home. We may have lost every game but we are getting better. Bring it on next week!! - David G.
Frank's Little Beauties 5 over Booze on First 1
Booze on first knew they would need to be on their game as we had a double header with a game against Franks Little Beauties and then one against Sacks and Racks. A last minute illness thrust captain Sam into the role of starting pitcher. Our defense was strong against Franks Little Beauties holding them scoreless in the first two innings. Unfortunately our usual problem of lack of offense continued to plague us. We kicked the ball well but just right at them. Our defense ultimately kept us in the game as we lost 5-0, a big improvement from out first meeting. Bethany made a great catch in right field. Vivek, Kevin, Bret, and Patrick all had solid defensive games. - Sam B.
Frank's Little Beauties kept on rolling with a 5-0 victory, keeping the undefeated season dream alive. FLB's got off to a slow start, as they reversed the batting order and kicked bottom to top. But once the train got rolling the other team was forced off the tracks. Team MVP of the week was Keivan Russo, who decided it was not important for him to show up on time for the game. He arrived in the fifth, going 0 for 0 from the plate, while recording the final out of the game with a putout from shortstop. An all-star performance for sure. - Chris T.
Sacks N Racks 7 over Booze on First 1In our second game we fell behind early due to some key bunts by Sacks and Racks. Jacqui played well at catcher almost making a great play at the plate - missing the tag by a few inches. Mary made a nice catch in right field. Kate used her speed to get on base acting as a pinch runner for Kathleen who was dealing with an injured back. The real highlight of the game was Peter scoring our only run and second of the season. He slipped and fell rounding third causing questions of was he injured, dead, or did he think he had already crossed the plate? Next up for Booze on First - scoring 2 runs in a game! - Sam B.
Sacks N Racks 4 over Ninja Island 1
Undermanned and overwhelmed, missing Skipper, Little Buddy, Ginger, Maryann, The Professor and Thurston P. Howell III, Lovey was tasked with facing Sacks N Racks all by herself. While she did well to hold Sacks down and get an early run, it was just too much for one wife of a multi-millionare to handle. Next week she hopes the Castaways return with reinforcements. - David M.
So You Want to Know a Kickball Star?
Special feature this week. Instead of learning about a kickball star, you have to guess the kickball star. Thanks to the photoshop wizardry of Tim, we have a shirt and nothing else. Tell us who this is. Please post your guesses in the comment sections below.
Miscellany
- Please visit here for tonight's schedule. Ninjas and Newton Benchmarks, you have the doubleheader!
- Please visit here for current league standings.
- DO NOT BRING ALCOHOL OR SMOKE AT GANN ACADEMY.
- DRINK AT SHOPPER'S WORLD.
- Don't forget to join us again this summer for the summer league. You can sign up here.
- Thanks as always to Tim for his great, great photos.
Next Week
First Rule of WAKA. Tell Everyone about WAKA.
Second Rule of WAKA. Remember the first rule of WAKA
Third Rule of WAKA. Lemur skin does not reflect kickballs.
Second Rule of WAKA. Remember the first rule of WAKA
Third Rule of WAKA. Lemur skin does not reflect kickballs.